Lindsay Clancy back in court as judge weighs next steps after mistrial
A Massachusetts court has heard arguments in the Lindsay Clancy case after her murder trial ended in a mistrial, with the defence seeking dismissal and a status hearing set for November.
The Full Story
A plain summary built from the channels that reported this story.
Lindsay Clancy, the US woman charged with murdering her three young children, returned to court in Massachusetts on Tuesday for the first time since her murder trial ended in a mistrial earlier this month. The hearing dealt with the next steps in the case, including whether she should face a second trial.
The original trial ended on 4 September after a single holdout juror prevented a unanimous verdict. The jury could not agree, so Clancy was neither found guilty nor not guilty. Jurors later spoke to the media and said 11 of them wanted to find her not guilty by reason of insanity, while one wanted to find her guilty. Some of the 11 jurors alleged that the lone juror had more than reasonable doubt, which is not allowed in court. The juror has denied this and said publicly that he was certain she was guilty and that what she did was planned.
Clancy's defence had long argued that postpartum psychosis meant she could not be held criminally responsible. At Tuesday's hearing, her lawyer shifted his argument, saying there was not enough evidence to tie her to the killings. He said the case should be thrown out and described the evidence that she killed her children as woefully deficient. The prosecution disputed that, saying its evidence was sufficient. A prosecutor also called the not-enough-evidence argument laughable, adding that a defendant with mental illness can commit crimes and be criminally responsible.
The defence also wants private juror conversations to be released and has called for the lone juror to be investigated, with allegations that he was on his phone during deliberations. The juror has denied that. The prosecution wants a gag order to stop Clancy's defence from discussing certain details with the media.
The judge scheduled a status hearing for 2 November and will weigh the requests. It is still not clear whether Clancy will face a retrial with a new jury. The court has not resolved whether the case will be dismissed or go back before a jury.
On screen
Stills are sampled automatically at 60-second intervals. Where shown, the still is the nearest available frame from the relevant broadcast segment and is included to show what was on screen during that part of the broadcast. A still may not correspond to the exact second of a quoted phrase.
Key Claims
Claims reported during this story's coverage, mapped by channel. Ordered by how many channels carried each claim.
| Claim | BBC News | BBC One |
|---|---|---|
| The defence wants the judge to find Lindsay Clancy not guilty because the prosecution had not proved her guilt in the first trial. | ||
| Lindsay Clancy returned to court in Massachusetts for the first time since her mistrial. | · | |
| The first Lindsay Clancy trial ended in a mistrial because the jury could not reach a unanimous decision, with 11 jurors favouring not guilty by reason of insanity and one favouring guilty. | · | |
| The judge scheduled a status hearing for 2 November, and it remained unclear whether Clancy would face a retrial. | · |
Channel Perspectives
What each channel focused on, with key quotes.
BBC ONE West previewed the hearing and focused on the background of the mistrial, the split jury and the defence argument that postpartum psychosis meant Lindsay Clancy was not criminally responsible. It framed the day as a fight over whether she faces a second trial, with possible appeals ahead. It did not report the judge's 2 November status hearing, the defence's new insufficient evidence argument, or the prosecution's gag order request.
- “The court in the United States will start to hear arguments today over whether a mother who killed her three children should face a second trial.”
- “The defence for Lindsay Clancy says she can't be held criminally responsible because she was suffering from postpartum psychosis at the time.”
- “11 of them wanted to find her not guilty by reason of insanity. But one juror did want to find her guilty”
BBC NEWS gave a post-hearing account, with more detail on the defence's changed argument, the prosecution's response, the judge's timetable and the unresolved question of a retrial. It also reported the defence request for private juror conversations and the prosecution's gag order request. Its tone was factual and focused on the legal manoeuvring after the mistrial.
- “Clancy's lawyer shifted her defense, arguing that there wasn't enough evidence to tie her to the killings.”
- “The first point that there isn't enough evidence to prove that she did it, I would suggest is a laughable argument.”
- “The judge on Tuesday scheduled a status hearing for November the 2nd.”
Broadcast Timeline
News broadcasts tracked for this story, in time order.