NYC council bill would force Amazon to hire delivery workers directly
A New York City council bill would require Amazon to employ delivery workers directly, citing safety and accountability.
The Full Story
A plain summary built from the channels that reported this story.
New York City is taking on Amazon over the way it handles deliveries. A city council bill would force the online retailer to classify the people who bring packages to doorsteps as employees, rather than relying on subcontractors. Supporters say it is about safety and accountability, while Amazon warns it will drive up costs and put jobs at risk.
The bill's co-sponsor, Tiffany Caban, argues that Amazon controls the working conditions but avoids responsibility when things go wrong. She said: "Amazon is setting the quotas, the routes, and setting the employment conditions. But then, when a crash inevitably happens, they get to say, whoa, not my employee, not my problem." The measure has the backing of the Teamsters union, which wants to see Amazon workers unionised. New York's mayor has also signalled support, saying: "If Amazon is delivering your packages, they should follow the same rules of every other delivery."
Not everyone in the delivery industry sees the bill as necessary. Christine Chan runs a company that is paid by Amazon to deliver its packages. Her workers wear Amazon vests and drive Amazon vehicles, but they are employed by her firm. She said her employees are not gig workers: "We have W2 employees that like what they have because we have steady, flexible work for them." She argues the bill misunderstands how the system works.
The cost of the change could be significant. One study estimates it would add $664 a year to each household's shopping bill. Amazon says the proposal would put more than 5,000 delivery jobs at risk and could force it to move delivery operations outside the city. But some workers welcome the move. One said: "For the big company at Amazon, it has to be held accountable for things such as injuries that may happen to us. With having the Amazon logo on us at all times is definitely a step in the right direction."
If the bill passes in New York, it could set a precedent. As the largest city in America, New York's decision may encourage similar legislation elsewhere. The debate highlights the growing tension between the gig economy model and demands for stronger worker protections.
On screen
Stills are sampled automatically at 60-second intervals. Where shown, the still is the nearest available frame from the relevant broadcast segment and is included to show what was on screen during that part of the broadcast. A still may not correspond to the exact second of a quoted phrase.
Key Claims
Claims reported during this story's coverage, mapped by channel. Ordered by how many channels carried each claim.
| Claim | BBC News |
|---|---|
| A study estimated the bill would cost $664 per household per year. | |
| Amazon said the bill would put more than 5,000 delivery jobs at risk. | |
| The bill would require Amazon to classify delivery workers as employees. |
Channel Perspectives
What each channel focused on, with key quotes.
BBC News focused on the political and labour dimensions of the bill, giving voice to the co-sponsor, the mayor, the Teamsters, a subcontractor, and a delivery worker. It balanced the safety and accountability arguments against Amazon's cost and job-loss warnings, and noted the potential national ripple effect.
- “Amazon is setting the quotas, the routes, and setting the employment conditions. But then, when a crash inevitably happens, they get to say, whoa, not my employee, not my problem.”
- “If Amazon is delivering your packages, they should follow the same rules of every other delivery.”
- “For the big company at Amazon, it has to be held accountable for things such as injuries that may happen to us.”
Broadcast Timeline
News broadcasts tracked for this story, in time order.