Woman tells Russell Brand trial he was a wild-eyed maniac at MTV
A second woman has told Russell Brand's trial that he indecently assaulted her at MTV in 2001 by trying to drag her into a toilet; he denies all charges.
The Full Story
A plain summary built from the channels that reported this story.
Russell Brand trial hears MTV assault allegation
At Southwark Crown Court, the trial of Russell Brand has continued with evidence from a second complainant, who alleges he indecently assaulted her at MTV in 2001. Brand, 51, faces seven charges: three counts of rape, three counts of sexual assault and one count of indecent assault. Six women are involved. He denies all charges and says any sexual contact was consensual.
The woman, who worked at MTV when Brand was a flagship presenter, told the jury from behind a screen that the encounter began when he asked where the bathrooms were on their floor. She offered to show him. She said his demeanour then changed. She alleges he grabbed her forearm firmly and tried to pull her into the men's toilet, saying, 'come in, come in with me'. She said she replied, 'what are you doing, are you mad, let me go'. He then pleaded with her, she said, 'please come in, do come in', and she described him as having a wild look in his eyes. She said he turned from jovial to a 'wild-eyed maniac'. She wrenched her arm free. She told the court the encounter lasted around 20 seconds and that she got away because she was strong, adding that the outcome could have been very different. She said she did not report it at the time because she thought it would be his word against hers and she had a mortgage to pay.
Under cross-examination, Brand's defence barrister, Ian Winter KC, suggested the episode was an invitation to a consensual encounter and that it was a short-lived, minor incident. The woman rejected that, saying being grabbed was not an invitation. She said the intent was there and it could have been very different. The defence also suggested her account changed after a 2023 Channel 4 documentary revealed other allegations against Brand. She denied that. The prosecution's case is expected to last several weeks.
Brand arrived at court with his wife, Laura Gallacher. In the dock, he held prayer beads at times. Outside court he said: 'Obviously it's an extraordinary and stressful situation but it is also an exploration of truth and justice and as I've said before, I pray for everybody involved.' He added that it was 'very, very sad' but hoped it could bring conclusions.
Earlier in the trial, the first complainant gave evidence about an alleged rape in a Bournemouth hotel room after the 1999 Labour Party conference. She said she met Brand at the conference, where he was performing in a satirical show. She invited him to her room because she thought it was work and believed he was gay and sexually safe. She alleged that when she came out of the bathroom he was partly naked, pushed her on the bed and raped her. She told the jury she said no and that he was heavy, that she felt she could not breathe and could not push him away. She described feeling like a zombie and thinking 'the quicker this is over, the better'. She said she did not report it until 2023 because she felt ashamed and thought no one would believe her. The jury was shown photographs she said Brand had asked her to take of him. A defence barrister put it to her that she had not struggled or said no and that Brand had persuaded her; she rejected that. The prosecution asked her directly if she said no, and she said she did.
A former colleague, Andrew Dobson, also gave evidence. He described Brand as vibrant, egotistical, lively, demanding and persuading, and said sex was a huge preoccupation for him. He recalled an atmosphere of panicked urgency when Brand wanted to leave the hotel at the time of the 1999 conference. Photographs of Brand in a cow-pattern costume from the cabaret show were released after proceedings.
The trial continues.
On screen
Stills are sampled automatically at 60-second intervals. Where shown, the still is the nearest available frame from the relevant broadcast segment and is included to show what was on screen during that part of the broadcast. A still may not correspond to the exact second of a quoted phrase.
Key Claims
Claims reported during this story's coverage, grouped by how many channels reported each one. Select a dot to see the source excerpt.
| Claim | | | | | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Widely reported · 4 or more of 5 channels | |||||
| Brand denies all charges. | |||||
| Jurors were shown a police video interview with a woman who alleges Brand raped her in 1999 after they met on the fringes of that year's Labour conference. | Reported by Channel 4 | ||||
| A second complainant alleged that Brand tried to force her into a toilet at MTV in 2001, saying his demeanour changed and he grabbed her forearm to pull her into the bathroom. | Not reported by BBC One | ||||
| Reported by a few · 2–3 channels | |||||
| A complainant said that during an alleged rape she told Brand she did not want to and he called her a spoilsport. | Not reported by Channel 5 | Not reported by BBC One | Not reported by Channel 4 | Reported by ITV | |
| Brand told reporters outside court that the situation was stressful, that he viewed it as a search for truth and justice, and that he prayed for those involved. | Not reported by Channel 5 | Not reported by BBC One | Not reported by Channel 4 | Reported by Sky News | |
| The court was shown photographs that the woman said Brand had her take of him shirtless before the alleged attack. | Not reported by Channel 5 | Not reported by BBC One | Not reported by Channel 4 | ||
| The second alleged victim testified from behind a screen. | Not reported by BBC One | Not reported by ITV | Not reported by Sky News | ||
| Only on one channel | |||||
| A woman accusing Russell Brand of rape told his trial she had nightmares about possibly being pregnant. | Not reported by Channel 5 | Not reported by BBC One | Not reported by Channel 4 | Not reported by ITV | |
| Andrew Dobson told the court that sex was a major preoccupation for Brand. | Not reported by BBC One | Not reported by Channel 4 | Not reported by ITV | Not reported by Sky News | |
| Brand and his wife are usually based in Florida. | Not reported by Channel 5 | Not reported by BBC One | Not reported by ITV | Not reported by Sky News | |
| Brand held prayer beads in one hand while listening to the evidence. | Not reported by Channel 5 | Not reported by BBC One | Not reported by Channel 4 | Not reported by Sky News | |
| Brand's barrister claimed the incident was short-lived and minor, and that Brand stopped when the woman refused. | Not reported by Channel 5 | Not reported by BBC One | Not reported by Channel 4 | Not reported by Sky News | |
| Brand's defence barrister suggested the incident was an invitation to something consensual and that the complainant's view changed after a 2023 Channel 4 documentary. | Not reported by Channel 5 | Not reported by BBC One | Not reported by Channel 4 | Not reported by Sky News | |
| The first complainant described Brand changing from camp and friendly to monster-like. | Not reported by Channel 5 | Not reported by Channel 4 | Not reported by ITV | Not reported by Sky News | |
| The first complainant rejected the defence suggestion that she was persuaded to have sex and maintained she did not want to. | Not reported by Channel 5 | Not reported by BBC One | Not reported by Channel 4 | Not reported by Sky News | |
| The second accuser said fear of not being believed stopped her from telling anyone. | Not reported by Channel 5 | Not reported by BBC One | Not reported by Channel 4 | Not reported by ITV | |
| The trial is expected to last at least five or six weeks. | Not reported by Channel 5 | Not reported by BBC One | Not reported by Channel 4 | Not reported by ITV | |
| The woman did not report the alleged rape at the time because she felt ashamed and thought no one would believe her. | Not reported by Channel 5 | Not reported by Channel 4 | Not reported by ITV | Not reported by Sky News | |
| The woman told police that the alleged rape was over quickly and that Brand said he had to get back to his mother. | Not reported by Channel 5 | Not reported by BBC One | Not reported by Channel 4 | Not reported by Sky News | |
Channel Perspectives
What each channel focused on, with key quotes.
This report leads on the first complainant's evidence and her cross-examination by Brand's defence. It focuses on the courtroom clash, with detailed quotes about consent, freezing, and her physical size. It does not cover the MTV complainant who gave evidence on a later day.
- “She categorically said, I did not fall under his spell. I did not find him attractive. I thought he was a gay man, she explained.”
- “She said, I felt I couldn't. I froze. Where was I supposed to have run to? I couldn't see my phone.”
- “he was really heavy. I felt I couldn't breathe.”
A short regional bulletin summary that covers the first complainant's evidence and the charges. It includes her explanation for not reporting and the prosecution's description of Brand's change in demeanour. It does not mention the MTV complainant.
- “I thought he was a gay man very softly spoken very effeminate. I felt safe I felt sexually safe with him.”
- “he was just dark and arrogant and performing. He was scary”
- “She said she didn't report it to police because she felt ashamed and thought no one would believe her”
This bulletin gives an emotional account of the first complainant's police interview and her testimony. It stresses her distress and Brand's born-again Christian image in court. It also reports the defence claim that any sexual contact was consensual.
- “looking back, he knew exactly what he was doing. He wasn't interested in helping me, he just wanted sex that night.”
- “This was something dirty that had happened to me. I felt really weak. I just shut down and blocked it out, she said.”
- “I categorically didn't find that man attractive. I thought he was gay. I thought he was sexually safe. He was certainly not my type, the woman said.”
This segment uses the trial mainly to trail a podcast, focusing on the first complainant's video police interview. It describes the domestic setting of the recording rather than the courtroom cross-examination. The rest of the segment moves to newspaper reviews.
- “We started the day by watching a what a two-hour video Yeah of this woman giving an interview to police”
- “It had the time stamp of 2023 in the corner and you're seeing this woman surrounded by the everyday clutter that we all have”
- “there were kids water bottles on the kitchen table Drawings up on the fridge held up with magnets”
This bulletin leads on Brand's doorstep comments before reporting the previous day's evidence. It also trails the podcast and keeps the first complainant's pregnancy nightmare detail in the summary. The trial coverage is brief before a shift to technology news.
- “obviously it's an extraordinary and stressful situation. But it is also an exploration of truth and justice. As I've said before, I pray for everybody involved.”
- “a woman who claimed she was raped by Russell Brand told the court that she had nightmares about the possibility of being pregnant”
- “Brand denies the allegations of sexual assault, including rape, of six women.”
This lunchtime report is one of the first to lead on the second complainant, the MTV case. It highlights her claim that she escaped only because she was stronger than Brand expected, and it tests the defence suggestion that her account changed after a 2023 documentary.
- “he became a wild-eyed maniac as he grabbed her forearm and tried to pull her into the bathroom”
- “in her world being grabbed was not an invitation”
- “Brand was a big asset. It would have been his word against mine, she said, and I had a mortgage to pay.”
This report gives a detailed account of the second complainant's evidence at MTV and the heated cross-examination. It focuses on the physical struggle, the 20-second encounter, and her decision not to tell bosses. It also includes Brand's denial and the expected trial length.
- “he went from being friendly and jovial to becoming a wide-eyed maniac during an encounter with his second accuser”
- “in my world that's not an invitation, that's forcing someone to do something against their will”
- “no, he was trying to pull me in. I wrenched my arm away, and I'm not repeating myself anymore. This is what happened, and it was not consensual.”
This bulletin widens the day's evidence to include a former colleague, Andrew Dobson, as well as the second complainant. It gives more context on Brand before he was famous and includes a support helpline. The tone is sombre and victim-focused.
- “he was a very vibrant character, very egotistical, I would say lively, sort of quite demanding and persuading. I think sex was a huge preoccupation for him.”
- “I recall Russell coming in and there suddenly being an urgency to leave. I only remember the atmosphere and almost a panicked urgency and it feeling tense and confusing.”
- “He said, come on, come in with me. He was trying to pull me in and I was trying to pull myself away. I said to him, what are you doing? Are you mad? Let me go. He had suddenly turned into a wild eyed maniac. I wrenched myself away.”
This evening report leads on the MTV complainant and her description of Brand as a wild-eyed maniac. It notes Brand held prayer beads in the dock and includes the defence's characterisation of the incident as short-lived and minor. It also states that the defence case has not yet begun.
- “Russell Brand turned into a wild-eyed maniac as he allegedly tried to drag a TV worker into a men's toilet”
- “She told the court how Brand's jovial demeanour changed. He became a wild-eyed maniac, she said, as he grabbed her arm and tried to pull her into the toilet.”
- “It was a very short-lived, very minor incident where he tried to get you into the lavatory and you refused and he left it there.”
Channel 4 focuses on the second complainant's evidence and the courtroom image of Brand holding rosary beads. It gives a sharp exchange over whether the encounter was consensual and frames Brand as a content creator facing allegations over a decade. It does not cover the first complainant's evidence in the same detail.
- “Thank God I'm strong, stronger than the average woman. It could have been, she said, very different.”
- “why would you try to drag someone into a toilet unless you wanted to assault them? I was there. I know what happened”
- “You don't grip someone to drag them in. That's not consensual.”
The late bulletin repeats the evening report on the second complainant, with the same focus on her account and the defence challenge. It includes Brand's prayer beads and his not guilty plea. It adds no new evidence beyond the earlier ITV coverage.
- “Russell Brand turned into a wild-eyed maniac as he allegedly tried to drag a TV worker into a men's toilet”
- “She told the court how Brand's jovial demeanour changed. He became a wild-eyed maniac, she said, as he grabbed her arm and tried to pull her into the toilet.”
- “It was a very short-lived, very minor incident where he tried to get you into the lavatory and you refused and he left it there.”
This report combines the second complainant's MTV evidence with newly released photographs from the 1999 Labour Conference. It highlights Brand's cow-pattern costume and the first complainant's 2023 police interview. It also trails the daily podcast.
- “Today, the court heard how he turned from jovial to a wild-eyed maniac.”
- “Here you can see images of Russell Brand dressed in a cow pattern costume from the cabaret show he performed in at the Labour Conference back in 1999.”
- “She first reported it in 2023, and jurors were played a video of that police interview.”
This later morning segment updates the trial with the second complainant's MTV allegation and Brand's comments outside court. It uses the same correspondent report as other Sky bulletins and then moves to a boxing preview. It does not add new legal detail.
- “A woman who says she was indecently assaulted by Russell Brand in 2001 has told the court how he turned from jovial to a wild-eyed maniac.”
- “Obviously, it's an extraordinary and stressful situation, but it is also an exploration of truth and justice and, as I've said before, I pray for everybody involved”
- “he was trying to pull me in. I wrenched my arm away and I'm not repeating myself anymore. This is what happened, and it was not consensual.”
Broadcast Timeline
News broadcasts tracked for this story, in time order.




